How much is the salary of a CompTIA PT0-002 certified professional?

The salary of the CompTIA PT0-002 certified professional is dependent on the experience of the candidate, the type of organization they work for, the skills and qualifications they have, the company, location, and the certification. The average salary of a CompTIA PT0-002 certified professional who prepared himself with the help of the PT0-002 Dumps is as follows:

In the United States: 65,000 USD
In Canada: 50,000 CAD
In India: 40,000 INR
In Australia: 55,000 AUD
In the United Kingdom: 59,000 GBP

Reference: https://www.comptia.org/certifications/pentest

CompTIA PT0-002 Exam Syllabus Topics:

Topic	Details
Planning and Scoping - 15%
Explain the importance of planning for an engagement.	- Understanding the target audience - Rules of engagement - Communication escalation path - Resources and requirements Confidentiality of findings Known vs. unknown - Budget - Impact analysis and remediation timelines - Disclaimers Point-in-time assessment Comprehensiveness - Technical constraints - Support resources WSDL/WADL SOAP project file SDK documentation Swagger document XSD Sample application requests Architectural diagrams
Explain key legal concepts.	- Contracts SOW MSA NDA - Environmental differences Export restrictions Local and national government restrictions Corporate policies - Written authorization Obtain signature from proper signing authority Third-party provider authorization when necessary
Explain the importance of scoping an engagement properly.	- Types of assessment Goals-based/objectives-based Compliance-based Red team - Special scoping considerations Premerger Supply chain - Target selection Targets 1. Internal - On-site vs. off-site 2. External 3. First-party vs. third-party hosted 4. Physical 5. Users 6. SSIDs 7. Applications Considerations 1. White-listed vs. black-listed 2. Security exceptions - IPS/WAF whitelist - NAC - Certificate pinning - Company’s policies - Strategy Black box vs. white box vs. gray box - Risk acceptance - Tolerance to impact - Scheduling - Scope creep - Threat actors Adversary tier 1. APT 2. Script kiddies 3. Hacktivist 4. Insider threat Capabilities Intent Threat models
Explain the key aspects of compliance-based assessments.	- Compliance-based assessments, limitations and caveats Rules to complete assessment Password policies Data isolation Key management Limitations 1. Limited network access 2. Limited storage access - Clearly defined objectives based on regulations
Information Gathering and Vulnerability Identification - 22%
Given a scenario, conduct information gathering using appropriate techniques.	- Scanning - Enumeration Hosts Networks Domains Users Groups Network shares Web pages Applications Services Tokens Social networking sites - Packet crafting - Packet inspection - Fingerprinting - Cryptography Certificate inspection - Eavesdropping RF communication monitoring Sniffing 1. Wired 2. Wireless - Decompilation - Debugging - Open Source Intelligence Gathering Sources of research 1. CERT 2. NIST 3. JPCERT 4. CAPEC 5. Full disclosure 6. CVE 7. CWE
Given a scenario, perform a vulnerability scan.	- Credentialed vs. non-credentialed - Types of scans Discovery scan Full scan Stealth scan Compliance scan - Container security - Application scan Dynamic vs. static analysis - Considerations of vulnerability scanning Time to run scans Protocols used Network topology Bandwidth limitations Query throttling Fragile systems/non-traditional assets
Given a scenario, analyze vulnerability scan results.	- Asset categorization - Adjudication False positives - Prioritization of vulnerabilities - Common themes Vulnerabilities Observations Lack of best practices
Explain the process of leveraging information to prepare for exploitation.	- Map vulnerabilities to potential exploits - Prioritize activities in preparation for penetration test - Describe common techniques to complete attack Cross-compiling code Exploit modification Exploit chaining Proof-of-concept development (exploit development) Social engineering Credential brute forcing Dictionary attacks Rainbow tables Deception
Explain weaknesses related to specialized systems.	- ICS - SCADA - Mobile - IoT - Embedded - Point-of-sale system - Biometrics - Application containers - RTOS
Attacks and Exploits - 30%
Compare and contrast social engineering attacks.	- Phishing Spear phishing SMS phishing Voice phishing Whaling - Elicitation Business email compromise - Interrogation - Impersonation - Shoulder surfing - USB key drop - Motivation techniques Authority Scarcity Social proof Urgency Likeness Fear
Given a scenario, exploit network-based vulnerabilities.	- Name resolution exploits NETBIOS name service LLMNR - SMB exploits - SNMP exploits - SMTP exploits - FTP exploits - DNS cache poisoning - Pass the hash - Man-in-the-middle ARP spoofing Replay Relay SSL stripping Downgrade - DoS/stress test - NAC bypass - VLAN hopping
Given a scenario, exploit wireless and RF-based vulnerabilities.	- Evil twin Karma attack Downgrade attack - Deauthentication attacks - Fragmentation attacks - Credential harvesting - WPS implementation weakness - Bluejacking - Bluesnarfing - RFID cloning - Jamming - Repeating
Given a scenario, exploit application-based vulnerabilities.	- Injections SQL HTML Command Code - Authentication Credential brute forcing Session hijacking Redirect Default credentials Weak credentials Kerberos exploits - Authorization Parameter pollution Insecure direct object reference - Cross-site scripting (XSS) Stored/persistent Reflected DOM - Cross-site request forgery (CSRF/XSRF) - Clickjacking - Security misconfiguration Directory traversal Cookie manipulation - File inclusion Local Remote - Unsecure code practices Comments in source code Lack of error handling Overly verbose error handling Hard-coded credentials Race conditions Unauthorized use of functions/unprotected APIs Hidden elements 1. Sensitive information in the DOM Lack of code signing
Given a scenario, exploit local host vulnerabilities.	- OS vulnerabilities Windows Mac OS Linux Android iOS - Unsecure service and protocol configurations - Privilege escalation Linux-specific 1. SUID/SGID programs 2. Unsecure SUDO 3. Ret2libc 4. Sticky bits Windows-specific 1. Cpassword 2. Clear text credentials in LDAP 3. Kerberoasting 4. Credentials in LSASS 5. Unattended installation 6. SAM database 7. DLL hijacking Exploitable services 1. Unquoted service paths 2. Writable services Unsecure file/folder permissions Keylogger Scheduled tasks Kernel exploits - Default account settings - Sandbox escape Shell upgrade VM Container - Physical device security Cold boot attack JTAG debug Serial console
Summarize physical security attacks related to facilities.	- Piggybacking/tailgating - Fence jumping - Dumpster diving - Lock picking - Lock bypass - Egress sensor - Badge cloning
Given a scenario, perform post-exploitation techniques.	- Lateral movement RPC/DCOM 1. PsExec 2. WMI 3. Scheduled tasks PS remoting/WinRM SMB RDP Apple Remote Desktop VNC X-server forwarding Telnet SSH RSH/Rlogin - Persistence Scheduled jobs Scheduled tasks Daemons Back doors Trojan New user creation - Covering your tracks
Penetration Testing Tools - 17%
Given a scenario, use Nmap to conduct information gathering exercises.	- SYN scan (-sS) vs. full connect scan (-sT) - Port selection (-p) - Service identification (-sV) - OS fingerprinting (-O) - Disabling ping (-Pn) - Target input file (-iL) - Timing (-T) - Output parameters oA oN oG oX
Compare and contrast various use cases of tools.	- Use cases Reconnaissance Enumeration Vulnerability scanning Credential attacks 1. Offline password cracking 2. Brute-forcing services Persistence Configuration compliance Evasion Decompilation Forensics Debugging Software assurance 1. Fuzzing 2. SAST 3. DAST - Tools Scanners 1. Nikto 2. OpenVAS 3. SQLmap 4. Nessus Credential testing tools 1. Hashcat 2. Medusa 3. Hydra 4. Cewl 5. John the Ripper 6. Cain and Abel 7. Mimikatz 8. Patator 9. Dirbuster 10. W3AF Debuggers 1. OLLYDBG 2. Immunity debugger 3. GDB 4. WinDBG 5. IDA Software assurance 1. Findbugs/findsecbugs 2. Peach 3. AFL 4. SonarQube 5. YASCA OSINT 1. Whois 2. Nslookup 3. Foca 4. Theharvester 5. Shodan 6. Maltego 7. Recon-NG 8. Censys Wireless 1. Aircrack-NG 2. Kismet 3. WiFite Web proxies 1. OWASP ZAP 2. Burp Suite Social engineering tools 1. SET 2. BeEF Remote access tools 1. SSH 2. NCAT 3. NETCAT 4. Proxychains Networking tools 1. Wireshark 2. Hping Mobile tools 1. Drozer 2. APKX 3. APK studio MISC 1. Searchsploit 2. Powersploit 3. Responder 4. Impacket 5. Empire 6. Metasploit framework
Given a scenario, analyze tool output or data related to a penetration test.	- Password cracking - Pass the hash - Setting up a bind shell - Getting a reverse shell - Proxying a connection - Uploading a web shell - Injections
Given a scenario, analyze a basic script (limited to Bash, Python, Ruby, and PowerShell).	- Logic Looping Flow control - I/O File vs. terminal vs. network - Substitutions - Variables - Common operations String operations Comparisons - Error handling - Arrays - Encoding/decoding
Reporting and Communication - 16%
Given a scenario, use report writing and handling best practices.	- Normalization of data - Written report of findings and remediation Executive summary Methodology Findings and remediation Metrics and measures 1. Risk rating Conclusion - Risk appetite - Storage time for report - Secure handling and disposition of reports
Explain post-report delivery activities.	- Post-engagement cleanup Removing shells Removing tester-created credentials Removing tools - Client acceptance - Lessons learned - Follow-up actions/retest - Attestation of findings
Given a scenario, recommend mitigation strategies for discovered vulnerabilities.	- Solutions People Process Technology - Findings Shared local administrator credentials Weak password complexity Plain text passwords No multifactor authentication SQL injection Unnecessary open services - Remediation Randomize credentials/LAPS Minimum password requirements/password filters Encrypt the passwords Implement multifactor authentication Sanitize user input/parameterize queries System hardening
Explain the importance of communication during the penetration testing process.	- Communication path - Communication triggers Critical findings Stages Indicators of prior compromise - Reasons for communication Situational awareness De-escalation De-confliction - Goal reprioritization

In recent years, many people choose to take CompTIA PT0-002日本語 certification exam which can make you get the CompTIA certificate that is the passport to get a better job and get promotions.

How to prepare for CompTIA PT0-002日本語 exam and get the certificate? Please refer to CompTIA PT0-002日本語 exam questions and answers on ITCertTest.

ITCertTest is a good website that provides all candidates with the latest IT certification exam materials. ITCertTest will provide you with the exam questions and verified answers that reflect the actual exam. The CompTIA PT0-002日本語 exam dumps are developed by experienced IT Professionals. 99.9% of hit rate. Guarantee you success in your PT0-002日本語 exam with our exam materials.

Furthermore, we are constantly updating our PT0-002日本語 exam materials. We will provide our customers with the latest and the most accurate exam questions and answers that cover a comprehensive knowledge point, which will help you easy prepare for PT0-002日本語 exam and successfully pass your exam. You just need to spend you 20-30 hours on studying the exam dumps.

ITCertTest provides you not only with the best materials and also with excellent service. If you buy ITCertTest questions and answers, free update for one year is guaranteed. You fail, after you use our CompTIA PT0-002日本語 dumps, 100% guarantee to FULL REFUND. You just need to send the scanning copy of your examination report card to us. After confirming, we will refund you.

What's more, before you buy, you can try to use our free demo. We provide you some of CompTIA PT0-002日本語 exam questions and answers and you can download it for your reference.

ITCertTest is no doubt your best choice. Using the CompTIA PT0-002日本語 training dumps can let you improve the efficiency of your studying so that it can help you save much more time.

Quick and easy: just two steps to finish your order. We will send your products to your mailbox by email, and then you can check your email and download the attachment.

The difficulties you can face while writing the CompTIA PT0-002 Certification Exam

The CompTIA PT0-002 Certification Exam is a tough exam. The difficulties of the CompTIA PT0-002 Certification Exam are as given here. The candidate doesn't know how and from where to start writing the actual CompTIA PT0-002 Certification Exam. The candidate doesn't know what the questions are and how to answer them. Unawareness about the topic of the CompTIA PT0-002 Certification Exam will result in failure. The candidate has to face many problems while writing the PT0-002 Certification Exam. It is difficult to predict the time required to complete the PT0-002 Certification Exam. The CompTIA PT0-002 Certification Exam is written by the expert, and the candidate has to face many difficulties while writing the PT0-002 Certification Exam. The candidates don't know about the resources that they can use to prepare for the CompTIA PT0-002 Certification Exam. If you are facing all these difficulties, keep calm and start reading from the PT0-002 Dumps.

CompTIA PT0-002日本語

About CompTIA PT0-002日本語 Exam

How much is the salary of a CompTIA PT0-002 certified professional?

CompTIA PT0-002 Exam Syllabus Topics:

Planning and Scoping - 15%

Information Gathering and Vulnerability Identification - 22%

Attacks and Exploits - 30%

Penetration Testing Tools - 17%

Reporting and Communication - 16%

The difficulties you can face while writing the CompTIA PT0-002 Certification Exam

0 Customer ReviewsCustomers Feedback ( Some similar or old comments have been hidden.)*